US v. Christian Parker, No. 17-6775 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6775 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTIAN PHILIP PARKER, a/k/a Armani, a/k/a Super P, a/k/a Sup, a/k/a King, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00529-LO-2; 16-cv-00700-LO) Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christian Philip Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Alexander, Mysti Dawn Degani, Brian David Harrison, Scott Butler Nussbum, Katherine Rumbaugh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Mary Katherine Barr Daly, Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christian Philip Parker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order granting Parker’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), in which Parker sought a further sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017) (noting that prohibition on a district court’s consideration of a motion to reconsider a § 3582 order is not jurisdictional and is waived if not invoked by the government). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.