Nathanael Reynolds v. State of South Carolina, No. 17-6663 (4th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6663 NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Defendants - Appellees. No. 17-6759 NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF CHARLESTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00298-BHH; 2:17-cv-00681BHH) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Nathanael Lenard Reynolds appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. * We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. South Carolina, Nos. 4:17-cv-00298-BHH; 2:17-cv-00681-BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 2017; May 16, 2017; June 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Reynolds moved for reconsideration in only one of the two cases. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
