Darrell J. Mickell v. Bryan Stirling, No. 17-6282 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6282 DARRELL J. MICKELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING; C. REYNOLDS; MR. DAVIS; MR. SHARPE; MR. GRAHAM; MR. NOLAN; MR. WILLIAMS; MS. SHAW; MS. SMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:15-cv-04656-RBH) Submitted: September 29, 2017 Decided: October 12, 2017 Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrell J. Mickell, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darrell J. Mickell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Mickell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and the magistrate judge’s orders denying his motions to appoint counsel and to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mickell v. Stirling, No. 6:15-cv-04656-RBH (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2015; Jan. 25, 2016; Sept. 13, 2016; Feb. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.