Mark Fam v. Bank of America, No. 17-2298 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2298 MARK FAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA (USA); GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, a/k/a Ditech Financial LLC; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, Defendants - Appellees, and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; DANIEL WHITEHEAD; ROSENBERG LAW FIRM, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00319-AJT-JFA) Submitted: June 29, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Fam, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Andrew Michael Williamson, BLANK ROME LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Mark Fam appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Fam first challenges the transfer of his action from the District Court for the District of Columbia to the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. However, we do not have jurisdiction to review this transfer because Fam failed to challenge the change of venue in the Eastern District of Virginia. See Brock v. Entre Comput. Ctrs., Inc., 933 F.2d 1253, 1257 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we dismiss Fam’s appeal as to the transfer. With regard to the dismissal of Fam’s claims for failure to state a claim, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fam v. Bank of Am., No. 1:17-cv-00319-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va., Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.