Fredicia Hardnett v. M&T Bank, No. 17-1538 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1538 FREDICIA HARDNETT; WILBERT A. HARDNETT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. M & T BANK; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP; JOHN DOE 1-10; JANE DOE 1-10, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00622-MHL) Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 23, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fredicia Hardnett, Wilbert A. Hardnett, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Miltz Luck, III, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fredicia Hardnett and Wilbert A. Hardnett appeal the district court’s order dismissing their suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardnett v. M&T Bank, No. 3:15-cv-00622-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 31 & Sept. 19, 2016; Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.