Peter K. Stern v. US, No. 17-1139 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1139 PETER K. STERN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00329-MR) Submitted: June 27, 2017 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: July 14, 2017 PER CURIAM: Peter Kay Stern appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stern v. United States, No. 1:16-cv00329-MR (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2016 & Jan. 12, 2017). We deny as moot Stern’s motions for final judgment on the pleadings and to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.