William Brown, Jr. v. Tompkins Builders, Inc., No. 17-1025 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1025 WILLIAM BROWN, JR.; B & M HITECH ELECTRIC, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. TOMPKINS BUILDERS, INC.; S. B. BALLARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; T. K. DAVIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; WATSON ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC; DAVID BROWN; DAVID COLLINS; RICHARD ALLARD, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00599-REP) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jaime Brett Wisegarver, HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Brown, Jr., and B & M Hitech Electric appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the Plaintiffs’ motion for an audience and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Tompkins Builders, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00599-REP (E.D. Va., Dec. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.