US v. Maurice Hardy, No. 16-7011 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICE HARDY, a/k/a Reece, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Peter Jeffrey Martinez, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurice Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. May, F.3d , , No. 15-7912, 2017 WL 1479288, at *4-5 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2017). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2 (D. Md. July 12, 2016 & July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.