Somchai Noonsab v. NC Government, No. 16-7005 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7005 SOMCHAI NOONSAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NC GOVERNMENT; W. BROWN; STEPHEN M. RUSSELL, SR.; MELANIE A. SHEKITA; MAGISTRATE E. RAY BRIGGS; PAUL G. GESSNER; MICHAEL G. HOWELL; PAUL C. RIDEWOY; DANIEL HORN, Clerk of Court; TERRI STEWART; ROY COOPER; MR. HOCKEY; CHRISTINA CAMERON ROEDEO; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND MORE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES IN SAID CASES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03122-FL) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Somchai Noonsab, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Somchai dismissing Noonsab without appeals the prejudice ∗ complaint as duplicative. no reversible error. his district 42 court’s § 1983 U.S.C. order (2012) We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Noonsab v. NC Gov’t, No. 5:16-ct- 03122-FL (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2016). We deny Noonsab’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ We conclude this is a final appealable order because Noonsab may not amend his complaint to cure the defect. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015) (holding that dismissal without prejudice is not appealable unless “the district court’s grounds for dismissal clearly indicate that no amendment could cure the complaint’s defects”). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.