Daniel King v. Charles Ratledge, No. 16-6582 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6582 DANIEL H. KING, Petitioner – Appellant, v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-hc-02183-FL) Submitted: September 20, 2016 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and September 27, 2016 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel civilly H. King, committed a under District the Adam of Columbia Walsh Child Code offender Protection and Safety Act, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02183-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.