Clotilde Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 16-1926 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1926 CLOTILDE C. JIMENEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; SHAPIRO & BROWN, LLP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN) Submitted: January 10, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017 Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clotilde C. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Montgomery Barnwell, Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, Nathan Ira Brown, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia, Sarah Reimers McIntee, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clotilde C. Jimenez appeals the district court’s granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. to proceed in forma pauperis. We See 1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2016; entered July 27, 2016). leave order dispense We grant with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.