Christopher Mossburg v. The State of Maryland, No. 16-1869 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1869 CHRISTOPHER MADDOX MOSSBURG, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-01633-RWT) Submitted: January 4, 2017 Decided: February 17, 2017 Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Maddox Mossburg, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher order dismissing 12(b)(6). error. Maddox his Mossburg pursuant complaint the to district Fed. R. court’s Civ. P. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons court. Mossburg v. Maryland, June 29, 2016). We dispense facts appeals and materials legal before No. with stated the 8:15-cv-01633-RWT oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court by (D. Md. because the presented would district not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.