Doreen Shing v. Walmart Corporation, No. 16-1563 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1563 DOREEN SHING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAL MART CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-00322-CCB) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 1, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Doreen Shing, Appellant Pro Se. Rachelle Elizabeth Hill, Kevin Michael Kraham, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Doreen Shing appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shing v. Wal Mart Corp., No. 1:16-cv-00322-CCB (D. Md. May 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.