Mitchell Sumpter v. A. Lane Cribb, No. 15-7753 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7753 MITCHELL LEE SUMPTER, a/k/a Mitchell Lee Truman Sumpter, a/k/a Mitchell L. Sumpter, a/k/a Mitchell Sumpter, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. A. LANE CRIBB, Sheriff of Georgetown County, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; MICHAEL A. SCHWARTZ, Chief Administrator, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; MAJOR MORTON, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; CAPT. WINEGLASS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; LT. ANDERSON, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SGT. HARRISON, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; CHAPLAIN WILLIAMS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; FOOD SUPERVISOR WALKER, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SGT. WRAGG, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SGT. HARRIS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SGT. DRYER, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SGT. WILLIAMS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER POINCET, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER MANOR, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER GIBBS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER OLIVER, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER PEREZ, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER ROBINSON, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER MATTHEWS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; OFFICER WASHINTON, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SERGEANT TEETER, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; MR. MARTIN, Maintenance, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; LT. CLAREY, All in their individual capacity and official capacity, Defendants – Appellees, and GEORGETOWN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, All in their individual capacity and individual capacity; NURSE CONNIE, a/k/a Constance Reichard, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; NURSE DOREAN, a/k/a Doreen McLean, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; DR. REEVES, a/k/a Thomas Rives, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; ALL MAINTENANCE STAFF, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; ALL LIEUTENANTS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; ALL SERGEANTS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; ALL CORPORALS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity; ALL OFFICERS, All in their individual capacity and official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (8:14-cv-00180-MGL) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mitchell Lee Sumpter, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Mitchell Lee Sumpter appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sumpter v. Cribb, No. 8:14-cv-00180-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.