Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi v. Terry McAuliffe, No. 15-7748 (4th Cir. 2016)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7748 ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TERRY MCAULIFFE, Virginia Governor; HARVEY BRYANT, Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; KATHERINE ORSINI, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; CATHERINE DODSON, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; CALVIN DEPEW, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; LEAH DARRON, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia; PETER LEGLER, Virginia Beach Public Defender; ANNET MILLER, Virginia Beach Public Defender; BENJAMIN THOMAS REED, Court Appointed Defense Attorney; SHEPHERD WAINGER, Direct Appeal Attorney; J. BRADLEY REAVES, Direct Appeal Attorney; DAVID EBERHARDT, State Department; RICHARD E. LUBOW, State Department; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; EDWARD HANSON, Virginia Beach Circuit Court Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reasons reversible stated by error. the district we court. affirm See for Makdessi the v. McAuliffe, No. 3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 2015). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.