James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton, No. 15-7589 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7589 JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HYLTON, CDUSM, U. S. Marshal Service; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff; STERNS, Chief; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY - ALEXANDRIA (VA); K. PEDERSEN, AUSA, EDVA; F. MILANO, Captain; J. COREY; G. HUNTER; LIEUTENANT M. JOSIAH; DIRECTOR, American Correctional Association; C. M. HILTON, USDJ, EDVA; EDWARD SEMONIAN, Circuit Court Clerk; R. STERNS, Deputy, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM) Submitted: February 16, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016 Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state a claim. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Hylton, No. 2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.