Alexander Matthews v. US, No. 15-6132 (4th Cir. 2015)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6132 ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee, and RYAN FAULCONER, AUSA; CARLA COOPWOOD, U.S. Probation Officer; BENNETT BROWN, Attorney; CHRISTINE WINDNESS, FBI Special Agent; JOHN DOE, Unknown Agent of Maryland State Attys. Office; JANE DOE, Unknown named agents of Maryland State Attys. Office; MICHAEL PAUZE, AUSA; ALICIA WOJTKONSKI, FBI Special Agent; ROD ROSENSTEIN, in His Official Capacity; NEIL MCBRIDE, in His Official Capacity; DISTRICT OF MARYLAND US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, in its Official Capacity; EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (ALEXANDRIA) US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, in its Official Capacity; BENNETT BROWN, in his Individual Capacity; RYAN FAULCONER, In his Individual Capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01473-LO-TCB) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Ayana Niambi Free, Assistant United States Attorney, Sosun Bae, Andrew Sun Han, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s order granting the United States’ motion to dismiss his Federal Tort Claims Act suit for lack of jurisdiction. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. United States, No. 1:12-cv-01473-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2015). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.