Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling, No. 15-6128 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6128 THOMAS M. FAIR, JR., a/k/a Thomas Marvin Fair, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRIAN P. STIRLING, RANDOLPH, Director; DR. JOHN B. TOMARCHIO; DR. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:13-cv-02940-RMG) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, Jay Ritchie Lee, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas orders: judge Marvin (1) and Fair, accepting denying Jr., the relief appeals the recommendation on his 42 district of U.S.C. the court’s magistrate § 1983 (2012), complaint, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fair v. Stirling, No. 6:13-cv-02940-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2014; filed Jan. 20, 2015 & entered Jan. 21, 2015). We deny Fair’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.