Roosevelt Johnson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., No. 15-2546 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2546 ROOSEVELT JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., A Virginia Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-04002-JFM) Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roosevelt Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Kevin Sheets, DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia; Robert Wai Wong, Assistant General Counsel, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roosevelt Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint in which he alleged that the termination of his employment was the result of retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). reversible error. We 2015). legal before (D. reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. cv-04002-JFM have Md. Johnson v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:14filed Nov. 13, 2015; entered Nov. 16, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.