Daryl Colinot v. East Beach-Bay Marine Marina, No. 15-2316 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2316 DARYL LEWIS GILLEY COLINOT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ESPEJO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RLLP T/A EAST BEACH MARINE MARINA; BLANDINE ESPEJO; VININGS MARINE, INC.; THE CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Dept. of Game & Inland Fisheries; STEPHEN J. GREGORY, an individual; BRIAN PARKER, an individual; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; ESPEJO FRIEND OR ASSOCIATE, JANE DOE; CUTTY SARK MARINA; JANE DOE, Co-Owner/Cook; OFFICER CROWDER, In Capacity of Chief of Investigations, Norfolk Police Department; CAPTAIN A. M. POMERANZ, Norfolk Police Department; CINDY HALL, In Capacity of Asst. City Atty; G. C. WALL, In Capacity of Police Officer; W. G. SNYDER, In Capacity of Police Officer; OFFICER LOGAN, Norfolk Police Department; POLICE OFFICERS, John Does 1-7 Norfolk PD; U.S. POSTAL WORKER JOHN DOE; DORITA ADAMS, as head of boat titling dept.; JOHN EVANS, as boat titling agent; CINDY MORGAN, as boat titling agent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00475-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. April 21, 2016 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daryl Lewis Gilley Colinot, Appellant Pro Se. Marissa Marriott Henderson, VENTKER WARMAN HENDERSON, PLLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Heather Ann Mullen, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia; Jonathan Duncan Pitchford, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Douglas Fredericks, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Daryl orders civil Lewis striking action, complaint. error. district Gilley his and Colinot third denying appeals amended leave to the district complaint, file court’s dismissing his fourth his amended We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Marina, No. 2:14-cv-00475-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 22 & Sept. 28, 2015). We dispense court. with contentions are Colinot oral v. argument adequately E. Beach-Bay because presented in Marine the the facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.