Mary Roberts v. Jay Roberts, No. 15-2019 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2019 MARY SUE ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAY A. ROBERTS; ASHLEY ROBERTS MCNAMARA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:15-cv-02099) Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 18, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry L. Bruce, BARRY L. BRUCE & ASSOCIATES, Lewisburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Michael R. Proctor, DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mary Sue Roberts appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed in her Chapter 13 proceeding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Roberts v. Roberts, No. 5:15-cv-02099 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 5, 2015). We deny Appellant’s motion with for judicial review. We dispense oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.