Lucas Mbole-Longonje v. Loretta Lynch, No. 15-1231 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1231 LUCAS MBOLE-LONGONJE; LIMUNGA MBOLE, MABEL MEJANE ENANG-EKANE; BELSY Petitioners, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 16, 2015 Decided: October 5, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer P. Williams, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jennifer A. Bowen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lucas Mbole-Longonje, a native and citizen of Cameroon, and his wife and daughter, derivative beneficiaries Mabel Mejane Enang-Ekane and Belsy Limunga Mbole, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of the Longonje’s requests protection under thoroughly reviewed Immigration for the denial withholding asylum, Judge’s of Convention the record, Against of removal, Torture. including the Mbole- We and have transcript of Mbole-Longonje’s merits hearing, his asylum application, and all supporting evidence. not compel a We conclude that the record evidence does ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny reasons stated by the Board. Feb. 9, 2015). the petition for review for the See In re: Mbole-Longonje (B.I.A. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.