Helen Dale v. MD DepÂ’t of Transportation, No. 15-1158 (4th Cir. 2017)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1158 HELEN DALE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION, OF TRANSPORTATION, MARYLAND TRANSIT Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00191-ELH) Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: January 11, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Helen Dale appeals the district court’s order granting the Maryland Department Transportation of Transportation’s Administration’s motion to and the dismiss Maryland Dale’s race and gender discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil §§ 2000e to discrimination Discrimination Rights Act 2000e-17 1964, (West claims, in of as 2008 brought Employment amended, & Supp. pursuant Act of 42 2016); to 1967, U.S.C.A. the as age Age amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); and unlawful employment practices claims, brought pursuant to the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20606(a)(1)(i) (West 2014). no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dale v. Md. Dep’t of Transp., No. 1:13-cv-00191-ELH (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2015). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.