Vanessa Spence v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, No. 15-1071 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1071 VANESSA SPENCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, d/b/a Wal-Mart, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge. (8:13-cv-01895-WGC) Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015 Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vanessa Spence, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Andrew Kohl, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vanessa Spence appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor closing her civil action. * of Wal-Mart Stores LP and On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. 34(b). East, See 4th Cir. R. Because Spence’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Spence has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.