Anthony White v. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., No. 15-1062 (4th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1062 ANTHONY E. WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00684-F) Submitted: May 28, 2015 Decided: August 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony E. White, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Forte Meddin, John Thomas Murray, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony E. White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his racial discrimination and retaliation claims filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). * find no reasons reversible stated by error. the We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, district court. we affirm White v. for the Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., No. 5:13-cv-00684-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2014). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * On appeal, White does not contest the district court’s disposition of his racial harassment and failure to hire or promote claims. He has therefore forfeited appellate review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009) (limiting appellate review to arguments raised in the brief). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
