Rodney Young v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. 14-7608 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7608 RODNEY DAVID YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LIEUTENANT PATRICK; CAPTAIN WRIGHT; OFFICER SABRINA RISHER; OFFICER JEFFREY MOSLEY; MS. VALERIE JACKSON; MS. J. BROWN; SERGEANT GREEN; WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02247-TMC) Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 2, 2015 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney David Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. claim challenging the propriety of his As to Young’s prison disciplinary proceeding, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:14-cv-02247-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2014). Young has forfeited appellate review of his remaining claims by failing to raise them in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.