US v. Samuel Crook, No. 14-4799 (4th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-4799 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant. No. 14-4801 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOCDSC-1) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. February 18, 2015 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Paul Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Paul Cook appeals the district court’s orders denying his pro se motion requesting that his 2005 plea of not guilty by reason of insanity be withdrawn. record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crook, Nos. (W.D.N.C. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; Sept. 16, 2014). We We have reviewed the United States v. 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
