John Stritzinger v. Bank of America, No. 14-2356 (4th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2356 JOHN S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; VERNON WRIGHT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-02409-TLW) Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John adopting S. the Stritzinger magistrate appeals judge’s the district recommendation court’s and order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a court order. * raised in Because basis On appeal, we confine our review to the issues the Appellant’s Stritzinger’s for the brief. informal district brief court’s See 4th does Cir. not disposition, R. 34(b). challenge the Stritzinger has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to remand, and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * appeal. We conclude that Stritzinger timely filed his notice of See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
