Heydi De Leon Martinez v. Loretta Lynch, No. 14-2325 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2325 HEYDI YUVISSA DE LEON MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 12, 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia I. Klingenberg, LAW OFFICE OF PATRICIA I. KLINGENBERG, San Diego, California, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant Director, D. Nicholas Harling, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Heydi Yuvissa De Leon Martinez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals immigration judge’s withholding Against (“Board”) of denial removal, Torture. We and have dismissing of her her appeal requests from for protection under the thoroughly reviewed the asylum, Convention the record, including the transcript of De Leon Martinez’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence does not evidence. compel a We ruling conclude contrary that to the any record of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and decision. that substantial supports the Board’s See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, reasons evidence stated we by deny the (B.I.A. Nov. 4, 2014). the petition Board. See In for re: review De Leon for the Martinez We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.