Anne Bremus v. AMR Corporation, No. 14-2301 (4th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2301 ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL) Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 16, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John B. Mann, JOHN B. MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel E. Farrington, THE FARRINGTON LAW FIRM, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anne Melchor Bremus appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings on Bremus’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). Bremus has filed a motion for leave to file materials as an attachment to her opening brief, and Defendants have filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we grant the parties’ pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bremus v. AMR Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00100-RBS- LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
