Terri Williams v. Kathleen Sebelius, No. 14-2231 (4th Cir. 2015)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2231 TERRI L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; ANN TAUBENHEIM, Supervisory Public Health Advisor, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, Department of Health and Human Services; TIMOTHY WHEELES, Acting Executive Officer, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; SALLY MCDONOUGH, Director of Communications, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cv-02527-RWT) Submitted: April 15, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terri L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Terri Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2012). no reversible error. stated by the We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district court. Williams v. Burwell, 8:13-cv-02527-RWT, 2014 WL 5797777 (D. Md. Nov. 5, 2014). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.