Eddie Wise v. USDA, No. 14-1947 (4th Cir. 2015)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1947 EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES DAVENPORT, Individually; MIKE HUSKEY, Individually; AARON A. MARTIN, Individually; JUAN M. GARCIA, Individually; TOM VILSACK, In his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture; PAULA F. NICHOLLS, Individually; DEBBIE HOUSTON, Individually; CYNTHIA I. KERNODLE, Individually; JOE LEONARD, In his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights of United States Department of Agriculture, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:13-cv-00234-BO) Submitted: January 16, 2015 Decided: February 3, 2015 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Wise, Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district evidentiary court’s hearing orders and granting dismiss their civil complaint. find no reversible denying error. the their motion Defendants’ for an motion to We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the See Wise v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00234-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2014; Aug. 19, 2014). We grant Appellants leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny their other pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.