Sirina Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, No. 14-1729 (4th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1729 SIRINA SUCKLAL, Debtor - Appellant, v. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Creditor – Appellee, NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00039-JFM) Submitted: November 25, 2014 Decided: December 4, 2014 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sirina Sucklal, Appellant Pro Se. MORRIS HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, LLC, Appellee. Gregory Christopher Mullen, Baltimore, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sirina Sucklal appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order lifting the automatic stay and allowing the sale of her real property. We have reviewed the record and find no error in the bankruptcy court’s decision. See In re Frushour, 433 F.3d 393, 398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the district court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we “review directly the Accordingly, we affirm. bankruptcy court’s decision”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
