Jean Destin v. American Home Mortgage, No. 14-1547 (4th Cir. 2014)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1547 JEAN R. DESTIN; CHARISSE M. DESTIN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, Defunct; PNC BANK, N.A., Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-1548 PNC BANK National Association, c/o Samuel I. White, PC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEAN R. DESTIN; CHARISSE M. DESTIN, Defendants - Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00332-REP; 3:14-cv-00373-REP) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam. Charisse M. Destin, Jean R. Destin, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In Appeal No. 14-1547, Jean R. Destin and Charisse M. Destin seek to appeal the district court s orders denying their motion for a temporary restraining order and warning that their action would be dismissed in thirty days if they did not submit a pleading setting jurisdiction. forth a valid basis for subject matter This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The orders the Destins seek to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In Appeal No. 14-1548, the Destins noted an appeal in a civil action before the district court had entered any orders. Because there is no appealable order for us to review, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.