Akil Rashidi Bey v. Commonwealth, No. 14-1398 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1398 AKIL RASHIDI BEY, ex rel. Akido Graves, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH; PWC ADULT DETENTION CENTER; TRACY CALVIN HUDSON, Judge, In his personal and official capacity; LON EDWARD FARRIS, Judge, In his personal and official capacity; PWC PRETRIAL SERVICES JANE DOE 1, In her personal and official capacity; PWC SHERIFF DEPT AND CO S JANE DOE 1, In their personal and official capacity; SHANDRA COBB, In their personal and official capacity; JAMIE SANSALE, In their personal and official capacity; CASA, In their personal and official capacity; CARYLON GRAHM, In their personal and official capacity; PWC SHERIFF DEPT AND CO S JOHN DOE 1-3, In their personal and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00176-LO-IDD) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: July 28, 2014 Circuit Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. and DAVIS, Senior Akil Rashidi Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia; Jeffrey Notz, COUNTY ATTORNEY S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Akil Rashidi Bey appeals the district court s order dismissing his U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm district court. Bey v. Commonwealth, No. 1:13-cv-00176-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.