Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler, No. 14-1364 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1364 BANORO GARRETT, Plaintiff Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER; SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; ROBERT J. MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; JANEL CUMMINGS, Defendants Appellees, and THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFF S OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO; OFFICER H. G. WHITE; SERGEANT G. SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; L. WILLIS; P. BELL; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: July 28, 2014 Circuit Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. and DAVIS, Senior Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Ruth Griggs, Joel Mark McCray, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Banoro Garrett appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garrett v. Weiler, No. 2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 25 & entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.