US v. Harold Fields, No. 13-7080 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7080 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD FIELDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1) Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North for Appellee. Hamilton, Carolina, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harold Fields appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 1 (M.D.N.C. July United States v. Fields, No. 2:89-cr-00251-JAB2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED We further note that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not the appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.