Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia, No. 13-1593 (4th Cir. 2013)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1593 MARIE ASSA AD-FALTAS, Party-in-Interest - Appellant, and JONATHAN DAVID MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF COLUMBIA; JOHN K. PASSMORE, in his individual and official capacity; JAMES HEYWOOD, in his individual and official capacity; AMANDA H. LONG, in her individual and official capacity, Defendants Appellees, and COLUMBIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (5:10-cv-00132-JFA) Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. December 19, 2013 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marie Therese Assa ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Michael Balthazor, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, MBR LAW, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Marie court s order injunction. Therese Assa ad-Faltas summarily denying her appeals motion the district a permanent for Assa ad-Faltas has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, as well as motions to mediate the appeal, to impose informal brief. sanctions, and to strike the Appellees The Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, to dismiss the City of Columbia from the appeal, and for sanctions against Assa ad-Faltas. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Assa ad-Faltas s application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the remaining pending motions and affirm the district court s order. Assa ad- Faltas v. City of Columbia, No. 5:10-cv-00132-JFA (D.S.C. May 1, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.