Kendall Smith v. Verizon Washington, DC, Incorporated, No. 13-1531 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1531 KENDALL R. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee, and VERIZON MID-ATLANTIC, INCORPORATED; VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED; REED SMITH LLP, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-01301-PJM) Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kendall R. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Tillman J. Breckenridge, REED SMITH, LLP, Washington, DC, Helenanne Connolly, REED SMITH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, Betty S. W. Graumlich, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Kendall R. Smith appeals the district court s order granting summary judgment to Verizon Washington, DC, Inc., Smith s former employer, in Smith s action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. error. district We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Smith v. Verizon Washington, 8:11-cv-01301-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2013). DC, Inc., No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.