Ding Jin Jing v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-1488 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1488 DING JIN JING, a/k/a Dian Jin Jiang, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: December 3, 2013 Decided: December 11, 2013 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nataliya I. Gavlin, GAVLIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Melissa K. Lott, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ding Jin Jing, a native and citizen of the People s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge s withholding Against of denial removal Torture. We of his requests and withholding have under thoroughly for the reviewed asylum, Convention the record, including the transcript of Jing s merits hearing, the record of Jing s sworn statement taken after his arrival in the United States, the evidence. credible fear interview and Jing s supporting We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to the Board s dismissal and that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012); INS v. Elias Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, dispense with contentions are oral we deny argument adequately the petition because presented in the the for facts review. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.