Arthur Armstrong v. Quentin Sumner, No. 13-1420 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1420 ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; RACHEL JOYNER, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00425-F) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: May 10, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral legal contentions are before this and argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.