Sidney Harr v. Richard Brodhead, No. 12-1450 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1450 SIDNEY B. HARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD H. BRODHEAD; DAVID F. LEVI; DUKE UNIVERSITY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00263-TDS-JEP) Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se. Dixie Thomas Wells, ELLIS & WINTERS, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sidney adopting the Defendant s B. Harr appeals magistrate P. recommendation and motion find no to to grant We record 12(b)(6) order complaint alleging Defendants violated his civil rights. the Civ. court s his reviewed R. judge s district dismiss have Fed. the reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harr s motion to schedule oral argument and affirm the district court s judgment. See Harr v. Brodhead, No. 1:11-cv-00263-TDS-JEP 5, (M.D.N.C. March 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.