Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck, No. 11-6072 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6072 SEBASTIAN X. MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THEODIS BECK, Defendant - Appellee, and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03017-FL) Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, Appellee. Elizabeth F. Parsons, North Carolina, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sebastian X. Moore appeals the district court s orders denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Beck, No. 5:08-ct-03017-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22 & Dec. 9, 2010). Moore s Bias Motion and motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) Judgment on the Pleadings are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.