Salame Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia, No. 11-2171 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2171 SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; GREGORY C. FLEMING; RONALD N. REGNERY; SCOTT CROWLEY; CROWLEY & CROWLEY LAW FIRM, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00423-REP) Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. George Walerian Chabalewski, Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Glen Allen, Virginia; Charles James Williams, III, BURNETT & WILLIAMS, Midlothian, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Salame M. Amr appeals the district court s orders granting the Defendants motions to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record leave and to find proceed no in reversible forma error. pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Attorney Gen. of Va., No. 3:11-cv-00423-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 22-23 & 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.