Robert Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake, No. 11-1525 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1525 ROBERT WARREN; JACQUELIN WARREN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP; ADAM M. GOTTSEGEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00071-BO) Submitted: January 26, 2012 Decided: February 17, 2012 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Craig M. Shapiro, KEOGH LAW, LTD, Chicago, Illinois; Richard J. Rubin, Santa Fe, New Mexico, for Appellants. John D. Burns, Camden R. Webb, Erica T. Meyers, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Warren and Jacquelin Warren appeal the district court s order dismissing their complaint under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (2006). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, No. 7:10-cv-00071-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.