Curtis Owens v. Bernedett Jefferson, No. 10-7143 (4th Cir. 2010)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7143 CURTIS Q. OWENS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. BERNEDETT JEFFERSON, LtSMU in their individual personal capacity under the color of state law; DARREN SEAWARD, Maj in their individual personal capacity under the color of state law; NFN ROBINSON, Inv DDI in their individual personal capacity under the color of state law; JERRY WASHINGTON, A-W in their individual personal capacity under the color of state law; ROBERT WARD, Dir of Ops in their individual personal capacity under the color of state law; JON OZMINT, Dir of SCDC in their individual personal capacity under the color of state law, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:09-cv-02888-TLW) Submitted: November 19, 2010 Decided: December 13, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Q. Owens, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr., William J. Thrower, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Q. Owens appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm on the district court s reasoning that Owens failed to properly claims exhaust of § 1997e(a) available constitutional (2006). administrative magnitude Owens v. (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2010). as Jefferson, remedies required No. as by to 42 his U.S.C. 0:09-cv-02888-TLW We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.