Douglas Roseby v. Paul Budlow, No. 10-6937 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: <

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on October 21, 2010.

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6937 MR. DOUGLAS M. ROSEBY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. MR. PAUL E. BUDLOW, et al., Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-00417-AW) Submitted: April 14, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas M. Roseby, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas M. Roseby appeals the district court s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, without prejudice, as not cognizable under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the district court s order. See Roseby v. Budlow, No. 8:10-cv-00417-AW (D. Md. Mar. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.