Maurice Dunbar v. Judge Purnell, No. 10-6778 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6778 MAURICE L. DUNBAR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JUDGE PURNELL, City of Columbia; INVESTIGATOR PETROSKI, City of Columbia; M.D. SLOAN, Officer, City of Columbia; CITY OF COLUMBIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-00995-HMH) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice L. Dunbar, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurice L. Dunbar appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Dunbar s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunbar v. (D.S.C. May 14, 2010). appointment of facts and materials legal before No. 8:10-cv-00995-HMH We further deny Dunbar s motions for counsel government expense. Purnell, and preparation of transcript at We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.