Nathaniel Green v. State of South Carolina, No. 10-6627 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6627 NATHANIEL HAROLD GREEN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF BERKELEY; FAMILY COURT; PAUL LABARRON; SANDY HOLLAND; JACK A. LANDIS; WAYNE M. CREECH; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (6:10-cv-00396-TLW) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Harold Green, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Harold Green appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. cv-00396-TLW We have reviewed the record and find no (D.S.C. See Green v. South Carolina, No. 6:10- Mar. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.