Robert Peoples v. Karl Vonmutiu, No. 10-6478 (4th Cir. 2010)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6478 ROBERT PEOPLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KARL VONMUTIUS, Sargeant, Lieber Correctional Institution; D. NUNNALLY, Captain, Lieber Correctional Institute; KEVIN WILLIAMS, Officer, Liber Correctional Institute; URIEL PALMER, Officer, Lieber Correctional Institute; OFFICER COX; MARK SELBY, Officer, Lieber Correctional Institute; ALBERT SMITH, Corporal, Lieber Correctional Institute; DENISE NORWOOD, Nurse, Lieber Correctional Institute; WILLIAM BRIGHTHART, Captain, Lieber Correctional Institute, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03977-CMC-BHH) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Peoples, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, Ginger Goforth, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spatanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Peoples seeks to appeal the magistrate judge s nondispositive orders entered on February 18, 2010, and February 25, 2010. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). orders The orders Peoples seeks to appeal are neither final nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Peoples motion dispense with for oral appointment argument of counsel because the is denied. facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.